A case of “green humbug”?
In recent weeks we have noticed a fresh wave of concerns and mixed perceptions around the Green Bond Market, which can be broken into four key themes: 1) Green bonds are being abused, 2) Green bonds create unhelpful segmentation in an increasingly illiquid debt market, 3) Green bonds do not inspire new green projects, and 4) Green bonds alone won’t do in tackling climate change.
“Green bonds are being abused”
Several highly ESG focused corporates have been reluctant in the past months to issue green bonds, arguing that this would risk diminishing their green credibility while pointing at green bond issuances in the past that have drawn criticism around so-called greenwashing to attract more investors and the seriousness of the green projects the issuances are supposed to fund.
Indeed, in a nascent and still low-regulated market, standards can vary significantly and transparency over how the proceeds will be used if there is no third-party verification is not always given. At the same time, those independent verifiers do not have to abide by any particular rules and, being paid by the issuer, might not be as independent as they claim to be.
At the other side of the table, ESG investors have acknowledged that a thorough due diligence is required before putting money into any green bond. Matching the independent verifiers on the issuer’s side with an army of ESG due diligence consultants – ranging from accountancy firms to management consultancies – on their side helps scrutinising the impact and effectiveness of green projects funded through a green bond. Indeed, the multi-pages long investor questionnaires do make it difficult for any issuers who hope to more easily collect funds by greenwashing their financial vehicle. Still, some examples of “bad green deals” for investors do come to light every year, however, they should not be a reason for non-participation in the market, but should, and will help to, further develop universally agreed standards.
“Green bonds create segmentation”
Several sovereigns have expressed concern that, amidst an increasingly illiquid debt market, green bonds create unhelpful segmentation and swamp the market with smaller, less liquid debt instruments. However, this is concern not shared often outside of sovereigns. The bond investor base is highly heterogeneous and hence appreciates the availability of a range of different debt types.
Furthermore, many of the larger ethical investors have been actively looking to source green private placements – linked to specific projects – and are therefore comfortable with the underlying illiquidity. With regards to sovereigns, any illiquidity concerns could be an argument for sovereigns to consider sustainability debt instruments to create a greater critical mass.
“Green bonds do not inspire new green projects”
An ongoing debate is whether green bonds can have the ability to function as a catalyst for new green initiatives or whether issuers simply flag a portfolio of sustainability projects they have already launched well before the placement.
While this might still be a strategy some issuers are persuing, we are actually finding that ethical investors buying green bonds place great emphasis on issuer engagement and do challenge issuers on improving their environmental and social commitments throughout the lifetime of the bond.
Companies are therefore increasingly paying heed to the need to be a 'green leader'. This, in turn, is forcing a treasury rethink. A typical treasurer would instinctively stay far removed from this green agenda, seeing their mandate as exclusively focused on the smooth functioning of the organisation's finances. However, such financial 'smoothness' is starting to become dependent on the company's greenness.
A compelling ESG profile is an increasingly important prerequisite for strong debt market access. Those with weak sustainability scores may have less flexibility in terms of timing and other parameters (such as tenor and coupon rate) when issuing bonds in the wholesale markets. As a result, their financing could be more expensive.
Questions around liquidity and funding policy – a treasurer's normal comfort zone – are substituted for enquiries on green procurement programmes, carbon dioxide emissions and so on. This can well be an eye opener for some corporates and not only trigger new green initiatives, but also result in a thorough corporate climate impact audit and consequently lead to a long-term, impactful, climate change mitigating green strategy.
“Green bonds alone won’t do”
Noting the scale of the challenge faced by COP21, market critics are pointing out that green bonds in isolation won’t do. Indeed, by themselves, green bonds are no panacea. They risk limiting a company's sustainability agenda to a mere portfolio of environmentally friendly projects.
However, internal and external stakeholders are demanding more from companies. Management boards are therefore seeking to make sustainability part of their firm's DNA, including the finance department.
Besides investors, there are a range of other pressures forcing treasurers to show their sustainability cards, including regulators, governments, NGOs and shareholders – and, perhaps most persuasively, their own boss. For many ambitious CFOs and CEOs, a green bond is not enough: they want their finance function or indeed their whole company to adopt a credible green strategy. So, if a placement of a green bond leads issuers on a genuinely “green path” then the bond has well shown that “it won’t do alone” but can be a green game changer.
This article has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes. It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this article has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information contained in this article, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The views expressed herein may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this article. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this article and any issues that are of concern to you.
This article does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.
NatWest Markets Plc. Incorporated and registered in Scotland No. 90312 with limited liability. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in the Netherlands, authorised and regulated by De Nederlandsche Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Branch Reg No. in England BR001029. NatWest Markets Plc is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets N.V. and NatWest Markets N.V. is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets Plc.
Copyright © NatWest Markets Plc. All rights reserved.
22nd November 2018
Dr Arthur Krebbers