Margin & clearing regulation: close but no cigar?
Behind the scenes the industry is scrambling on readiness for the final phases of Initial Margin and EMIR Clearing. There is however confusion on scope, requirements and whether the effort will be worth it. So where are we?
In November the FSB published their final report on Incentives to centrally clear over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives which concluded that financial regulatory reforms are achieving their intended goals of promoting central clearing.
But will more regulation reduce systemic risk further?
Smaller clients report difficulties obtaining access to central clearing, while the anticipated cost of implementing margin for non-cleared Phase 4 and 5 may be moot if the calculations result in no Initial Margin (IM) ever being exchanged.
The BIS understandably addressed the high-level risks to clearing in its 2018 BIS Quarterly report. It cited the concentrated nature of the clearing pool and the risk that banks and CCPs might interact in a way which serves to destabilize the marketplace via a negative feedback loop. This could be true even if portfolio-level risk is reduced between banks and their counterparties. Clearly the regulators do not want a systemic result that cancels out ground level benefits.
What is certain is that the upcoming phases for mandatory Initial Margin and Clearing will bring many new players into scope. Together with voluntary margining incentives, ISDA estimates that as many as 1,100 new market participants may enter the margining and clearing arenas by the time Phase V completes in 2020.
Is the market really aware of the ticking clock on the road to implementation? Have regulators taken enough notice to propose changes of scope in time for practical benefit?
Margin for non-cleared September 2019 & 2020
One of the challenges right now is estimating the number of new counterparties in scope and amount of IM to be exchanged.
- In 2019 Financial Counterparties are brought into the regulation by having entered into more than EUR750bn notional (at a consolidated group level across all their dealers) in uncleared derivatives (including deliverable forwards and FX swaps) during the ‘lookback period’ Mar – May.
- In 2020, Phase V threshold drops substantially to EUR8bn of notional with many more counterparties coming into scope.
The dramatic fall in threshold between 2019 and 2020 (EUR0.75trn to EUR8bn) will bring many participants into scope.
However there is another threshold that determines actual IM exchange despite being in scope of the regulation. This EUR50m threshold is the line at which IM is only exchanged for amounts over it and can be allocated across the trading entity. This in turn could lead to documentation, custodial accounts and operational capabilities sitting dormant.
It is expected that a significant number of the buy-side population will be caught over the two phases and change the nature of the non-cleared derivatives market. Across Phases IV and V, the estimated number of new agreements that will need to be put in place is 57,000 and 10+ custodians will be handling IM for the first time. ISDA, noting this has produced a white paper setting out reasons why the threshold needs to be higher thereby removing participants – whether this is successful is up for debate.
So what does this mean?
It will take time and resources to align documentation, operating models and prepare for compliance:
- potentially Lengthy Documentation Negotiation
- changes to Daily Collateral Processes and IM calculations
- collateral Eligibility Modifications
- sourcing & Costing of the collateral considerations.
EMIR Clearing June 2019
Under current EMIR regulation, counterparties in scope for clearing are divided into 4 categories with 2 and 3 being split by over / under the EUR8bn notional in OTC derivatives.
All categories are live with mandatory clearing save for Category 3. Since the EC is considering whether some FCs in Category 3 need to clear at all. The market was expecting a change to EMIR regulation, the ‘EMIR REFIT’, that would split Category 3 FCs into two more categories, either a FC having to clear or a Small Financial Counterparty (SFC) that won’t.
To determine whether a Financial Counterparty is a SFC, a group wide Annual AMEANA* assessment had been proposed, with a EUR3bn threshold suggested for rates products**. This SFC classification would be a direct EU response to Clearing House access and the associated costs as mentioned. This regulation would have made SFCs out of scope of the clearing obligation and by extension, MiFID2 Derivative Trading Obligations.
However, there are concerns that this change in regulation will not be passed in sufficient time before June 2019, when Category 3 FCs will become in scope for mandatory clearing. Currently the proposal is with the EC, but little clarity on when this regulation will now enter into force. It is possible that regulators may be prepared to exercise forbearance to permit SFCs not to clear but as yet there have been no statements.
Given the time it may take for a counterparty to set up clearing infrastructure (agreeing clearing brokers, MarkitWire, CDEAs etc), it is something affected market participants will need to take a view on.
* Aggregate Month End Average Notional Amount
** Suggested Group Wide AMEANA Assessment for all products
With this evolving landscape the only certainty is that these regulations will change the way we operate therefore important we have an open dialogue.
All information correct at time of writing.
Head of Market Structure ＆ Regulatory Customer Engagement
This article has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes. It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this article has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information contained in this article, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The views expressed herein may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this article. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this article and any issues that are of concern to you.
This article does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.
NatWest Markets Plc. Incorporated and registered in Scotland No. 90312 with limited liability. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in the Netherlands, authorised and regulated by De Nederlandsche Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Branch Reg No. in England BR001029. NatWest Markets Plc is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets N.V. and NatWest Markets N.V. is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets Plc.
Copyright © NatWest Markets Plc. All rights reserved.
25th February 2019
Head of Market Structure &
Regulatory Customer Engagement